$59.99
Research Studies:
Out of stock
FREE Shipping on
orders over $200
ALL ARTICLES AND PRODUCT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. The products offered on this website are intended solely for research and laboratory use. These products are not intended for human or animal consumption. They are not medicines or drugs and have not been evaluated or approved by the FDA to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or medical condition. Any form of bodily introduction is strictly prohibited by law.
GHK-Cu 50mg is a research-use-only laboratory material supplied for controlled research workflows, compound characterization, and analytical documentation review. It is manufactured under rigorous quality standards to support consistency, traceability, and batch-specific verification for qualified laboratory settings.
GHK-Cu 50mg is intended strictly for laboratory research use only. This product is not intended for human or animal consumption, therapeutic use, diagnostic use, clinical use, veterinary use, or as a food, drug, cosmetic, dietary supplement, or household product.
| CAS No. | 49557-75-7 |
|---|---|
| Purity | ≥99% |
| Sequence | Gly-His-Lys•2(Cu•2H2O) |
| Molecular Formula | C14H24N6O4 |
| Molecular Weight | 340.93 g/mol |
| Appearance | Skin regeneration research, anti-aging studies, hair growth research |
| Synthesis | Solid-phase synthesis |
| Format | Lyophilized powder |
| Solubility | Soluble in water or dilute acid |
| Stability & Storage | Stable for up to 24 months at -20°C. After reconstitution, may be stored at 4°C for up to 4 weeks or at -20°C for up to 6 months. |
| Applications | Tissue regeneration, wound healing, cosmetics, dermatology |
| Shipping Conditions | Shipped at ambient temperature; once received, store at -20°C |
| Regulatory/Compliance | Manufactured in a facility that adheres to cGMP guidelines |
| Safety Information | Refer to provided MSDS |
Consider these supplementary peptides for a comprehensive research approach.
Researchers searching for buy GHK-Cu online should evaluate GHK-Cu as a research-use-only laboratory material, not a consumer product. For laboratory buyers, the key considerations are compound identity, purity documentation, batch-specific COAs, lot traceability, product labeling, and storage information. This guide explains how to evaluate GHK-Cu for controlled research procurement through Pure Lab Peptides while keeping the inquiry focused on RUO sourcing, analytical documentation, and supplier evaluation.
Researchers can buy GHK-Cu online for laboratory research by reviewing RUO labeling, batch-specific COA documentation, purity data, identity information, storage guidance, and supplier transparency before selecting a source. Products discussed in this article are intended for laboratory research use only and are not intended for human or animal consumption.
The phrase “buy GHK-Cu online” is addressed here as laboratory research procurement intent, not personal-use intent. In this context, qualified researchers and technical procurement teams are evaluating whether a GHK-Cu research material is clearly labeled for research use only, supported by a batch-specific certificate of analysis, and accompanied by documentation that can be retained in laboratory records.
Research-use-only sourcing should prioritize documentation over marketing language. FDA guidance for RUO-labeled in vitro diagnostic products provides a useful compliance model because it separates laboratory research positioning from clinical or diagnostic use claims [1]. Laboratory buyers should also consider whether test reports, certificates, and supplier records are consistent with competent testing and calibration practices, which ISO/IEC 17025 describes as a framework for reliable laboratory results [2].
For GHK-Cu procurement, the practical review includes RUO labeling, compound identity, GHK-Cu COA access, purity documentation, lot traceability, storage and handling information, and supplier language that avoids product-use claims. This article does not provide use instructions, preparation steps, protocols, or therapeutic guidance.
GHK-Cu is commonly used to describe a copper complex associated with the tripeptide glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine, often abbreviated GHK. PubChem identifies a GHK-Cu record and also identifies glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine as a parent compound record, which is useful for laboratory identity review and naming consistency [3] [4]. A peptide is a short chain of amino acids linked by peptide bonds, according to the National Human Genome Research Institute definition [5].
DrugBank describes prezatide as a tripeptide consisting of glycine, histidine, and lysine that readily forms a complex with copper ions [6]. In research procurement language, that means buyers should confirm the listed compound name, formula or molecular category, and supplier documentation rather than relying on abbreviated naming alone.
The GHK sequence has a long research history. A 1977 paper identified the growth-modulating serum tripeptide as glycyl-histidyl-lysine [7]. Earlier publications reported GHK-related activity in cell-culture research settings, but those publications should be treated as historical scientific context, not as product-use guidance for an RUO material [8] [9].
GHK-Cu fits the copper peptide research category. Research literature related to cellular pathways should not be converted into product-use claims for RUO materials. For procurement, the safer and more relevant focus is compound characterization, GHK-Cu identity testing, analytical documentation, and lot-level traceability.
Researchers search “buy GHK-Cu online” to compare RUO product availability, identity documentation, purity data, COA access, label consistency, and supplier transparency. A qualified laboratory buyer may also need to confirm that the product form, stated purity, product name, and lot number align across the product page, label, packing documentation, and batch-specific COA.
The commercial phrase buy GHK-Cu should not be interpreted as consumer buying advice. In a research procurement workflow, it means identifying a supplier that presents GHK-Cu research-use-only material with clear documentation, avoids unsupported outcome claims, and provides records that can be retained for internal laboratory review. Procurement teams may also compare shipping policies, storage language, and documentation access before placing a laboratory order.
Researchers planning to buy GHK-Cu online for laboratory research should evaluate quality signals as documentation signals, not as personal-use claims. A complete review considers RUO labeling, batch-specific COA availability, GHK-Cu purity documentation, GHK-Cu identity testing, product form, and lot traceability together.
| Evaluation Area | What Researchers Should Review | Why It Matters for RUO Procurement |
| RUO labeling | Confirm the product is clearly labeled for research use only | Helps separate research procurement from human-use positioning |
| COA availability | Review the batch-specific certificate of analysis | Supports lot-level documentation and quality review |
| Purity data | Look for analytical support for the stated purity | Helps evaluate material consistency |
| Identity testing | Review HPLC, LC-MS, mass spectrometry, or related identity data | Helps confirm the material matches the listed compound |
| Lot traceability | Match lot numbers across product and documentation | Supports research recordkeeping |
| Product form | Confirm whether the material is supplied as lyophilized powder or another documented form | Supports laboratory planning |
| Storage information | Review storage and handling documentation | Helps maintain material integrity in laboratory settings |
| Supplier language | Confirm the supplier avoids dosing, therapeutic, or personal-use claims | Supports research-use-only positioning |
A GHK-Cu supplier documentation review should include compound name, lot number, test date, purity percentage, analytical method, identity confirmation, molecular weight or related identity information, product form, and storage documentation. A purity percentage alone does not establish complete compound identity; researchers should evaluate purity, identity, method, lot number, and documentation together.
Analytical method context matters because different methods answer different questions. LC-MS and other mass spectrometry approaches can support identity and molecular characterization, while chromatographic methods may support purity or quantitation depending on how the method is designed and validated. GHK-Cu has appeared in analytical work using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, glow discharge mass spectrometry, and HILIC-UV quantitation approaches [18] [19] [20].
General analytical guidance also supports reviewing method suitability, specificity, validation characteristics, and lifecycle controls. FDA guidance on ICH Q2(R2) describes validation principles for analytical procedures, while Q14 addresses science-based analytical procedure development [21] [22].
Published GHK and GHK-Cu literature spans compound identity, peptide sequence determination, cell-culture research, copper coordination chemistry, computational binding studies, and analytical detection. The evidence landscape is mixed: some sources are database records, some are early experimental studies, some are coordination chemistry papers, and some are method-development studies. None of those categories should be interpreted as instructions for use of an RUO product.
Historical studies reported GHK-related observations in cell-culture settings and discussed the relationship between the tripeptide and metal ions [8] [9] [11]. Coordination chemistry work examined interactions between copper(II) and glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine through approaches such as titration, spectroscopy, EPR, and structural analysis [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]. Computational literature has also modeled copper binding to the GHK peptide [17].
Published clinical literature should not be interpreted as use guidance for RUO materials. Research literature related to cellular pathways should not be converted into product-use claims for RUO materials. For this page, the relevant takeaway is narrower: literature can help define the compound and research category, while procurement decisions should be based on RUO labeling, COA documentation, identity testing, purity data, and supplier transparency.
| Research Area | What Literature Examines | Evidence Type | RUO Interpretation |
| Compound identity | Molecular structure, sequence, formula, or classification | Database / analytical | Supports identification, not product-use claims |
| Pathway or category context | Copper peptide chemistry, peptide-metal complex research, and model-specific cellular pathway literature | Review / in vitro / preclinical | Useful for research context, not therapeutic claims |
| Analytical testing | Purity, identity, and batch verification | HPLC / LC-MS / mass spectrometry / COA | Supports documentation review |
| Storage and stability | Material form and handling considerations | Laboratory documentation | Supports research workflow planning |
For GHK-Cu research material, evidence should be read through the lens of documentation and characterization. PubChem and DrugBank records support naming and identity review; coordination chemistry studies support compound-class context; analytical studies support method awareness; and RUO procurement records support laboratory documentation [3] [6] [12] [20].
| Research-Safe Statement | Why It Is Acceptable | Non-Compliant Version to Avoid |
| “GHK-Cu is discussed in published research related to copper peptide chemistry and cellular pathway models.” | Describes literature context without making a product claim | “GHK-Cu helps with a human outcome.” |
| “Researchers should review COA and identity data before procurement.” | Focuses on documentation and quality review | “Users should buy GHK-Cu for results.” |
| “Pure Lab Peptides supplies GHK-Cu as a research-use-only material.” | Clarifies intended use | “Pure Lab Peptides supplies GHK-Cu for therapy.” |
| “The phrase buy GHK-Cu online is addressed as research procurement intent.” | Qualifies commercial search intent | “Buy GHK-Cu online for personal use.” |
| “GHK-Cu supplier documentation should include purity, identity, and lot-level information.” | Centers the review on analytical records | “Supplier claims can replace analytical documentation.” |
Pure Lab Peptides presents GHK-Cu 50mg as a research-use-only material for qualified laboratory procurement. The product is supplied as lyophilized powder, carries a ≥99% purity claim, and has a batch-specific COA available for review. Researchers should review the product page, RUO labeling, purity information, storage and handling documentation, and lot-level traceability before adding the material to internal procurement records.
Review the Pure Lab Peptides GHK-Cu research-use-only product page for RUO labeling, product details, purity information, and batch-specific documentation. Researchers comparing broader sourcing options can also review the Pure Lab Peptides research peptide collection, the Pure Lab Peptides blogs, and shipping and returns information for procurement planning.
Buy GHK-Cu online should not be interpreted as personal-use guidance on this page. The phrase is addressed as laboratory procurement intent for qualified researchers reviewing RUO labeling, documentation, purity data, identity information, and supplier transparency.
Published GHK-Cu literature can provide research context, compound-class context, or analytical context. It does not provide directions for RUO materials. Research literature related to cellular pathways should not be converted into product-use claims for RUO materials.
Purity is only one quality signal. A GHK-Cu purity documentation review should also consider identity testing, lot number, method description, product name, test date, and whether the COA matches the material received.
For research procurement, a batch-specific COA is more useful than generic quality language because it connects the documentation to a lot number. Lot-level traceability supports internal laboratory recordkeeping and procurement review.
RUO labeling supports laboratory research positioning only. It does not convert GHK-Cu into a consumer product, clinical product, diagnostic product, or veterinary product. The intended context is controlled laboratory research procurement.
Researchers can buy GHK-Cu online for laboratory research from an RUO supplier that provides clear product labeling, batch-specific COA access, purity documentation, identity information, storage guidance, and supplier transparency. Pure Lab Peptides provides a GHK-Cu 50mg product page for research procurement review.
Before buying GHK-Cu online, researchers should check RUO labeling, batch-specific COA status, GHK-Cu purity documentation, GHK-Cu identity testing, product form, lot number consistency, storage information, and supplier language. The review should focus on documentation rather than consumer-style claims.
A COA matters when buying GHK-Cu because it links the research material to batch-level documentation. A strong review looks at compound name, lot number, purity, method, identity information, and documentation consistency. A GHK-Cu COA supports procurement records, but it should be reviewed alongside labeling and storage information.
GHK-Cu discussed here is not intended for human or animal consumption. This article addresses GHK-Cu research-use-only sourcing for qualified researchers, laboratory buyers, technical procurement teams, and research institutions evaluating documentation, identity, purity, and supplier transparency.
Research use only means GHK-Cu is positioned as a laboratory research material, not as a consumer, clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, or veterinary product. For procurement, RUO review should include labeling, COA documentation, identity testing, purity support, lot traceability, and storage documentation.
Published literature about GHK-Cu should be interpreted as scientific context for compound identity, copper peptide chemistry, cellular pathway models, or analytical methods. It should not be interpreted as product-use guidance, protocol guidance, or evidence of intended use for an RUO material.
Qualified researchers evaluating GHK-Cu should review product labeling, COA status, identity documentation, storage information, purity information, and supplier transparency. Review the GHK-Cu product page for RUO labeling, purity information, and available batch-specific documentation.
Our team is ready to assist you with any inquiries regarding our catalogue of peptides and their applications.
Discount Applied Successfully!
Your savings have been added to the cart.
There are no reviews yet.